
Apple Just Exposed the Biggest Lie in AI: Why 'Thinking' Machines Still Can't Reason
If you’ve been watching the news, you’ve probably felt that familiar mix of awe and unease around AI. The big tech giants want you to believe we’re living in the age of reasoning machines. The truth is, Apple just blew a hole through that entire narrative—and the fallout is huge.
The Hype Machine: Silicon Valley’s ‘Thinking’ AI
For the past few years, companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic have been pitching AI models like ChatGPT and Claude as systems that can “think” and “reason” like humans. The business world bought in. Investors poured billions into the dream of artificial general intelligence, hoping these tools would replace complex decision-making and human creativity.
But that’s just it. As Apple’s new research shows, the reality is a lot messier—and frankly, a lot less magical.
What Did Apple Actually Find?
Apple published a bombshell research paper called “The Illusion of Thinking” that set the internet on fire (see 9to5Mac’s analysis). Their approach was simple but devastating: they designed new logic puzzles—problems no AI model had ever seen—and tested today’s best “reasoning” AI systems against them.
When faced with problems outside their training data, AI models like Claude 3.7 Sonnet, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini fell apart.
As problem complexity increased, accuracy didn’t just drop—it collapsed, falling from 80%+ to near zero (full Reddit summary).
Even when given step-by-step instructions, these models failed to follow their own logic on novel tasks (Analytics Vidhya).
Let me explain. This isn’t like catching a chatbot making a typo or forgetting a fact. These models couldn’t reason their way through even simple puzzles that a ten-year-old could solve—unless they’d seen something similar before.
Why This Is Such a Big Deal
It’s cool and all… but not that useful for businesses if your AI collapses every time it faces something new. The multi-trillion dollar AI industry has been riding a wave of promises about “step-by-step thinking,” “hybrid reasoning,” and “human-level intelligence.” Apple’s findings show most of it is just sophisticated pattern-matching. The moment you change the pattern, the magic disappears (NDTV Tech).
The truth is, this should make every entrepreneur and decision-maker pause. If you’re planning your business around AI “reasoning” your way out of complex problems—good luck getting anywhere.
How the Hype Fooled Even the Smartest in the Room
Anthropic marketed their latest Claude model as a breakthrough in hybrid reasoning. OpenAI and Google demoed chatbots that solved complex problems and gave detailed explanations. Tech media, from 9to5Mac to VentureBeat, ran headlines declaring “the dawn of thinking machines.”
But the real test is what happens when you throw something new at these models. Apple’s experiment—by using never-seen-before puzzles—showed that all this “reasoning” was mostly memorization (Hacker News discussion).
What’s Actually Going On Inside These AIs?
Imagine you’re at a math competition and the only reason you’re acing it is because you’ve already seen every question. That’s the situation with most current AIs. They can look very smart—right up until you change the rules.
Here’s the kicker: when the problems got harder, these so-called “intelligent” AIs put in less effort. They produced shorter, lazier answers, almost as if they gave up. If you or I face a tough challenge, we dig in. These AIs? They take the easy way out.
The research showed this “complexity cliff” over and over: performance doesn’t decline smoothly; it collapses the minute things get tough.
Why It Matters for Entrepreneurs and Business Owners
Don’t get me wrong—AI is powerful. It can generate content, analyze tons of data, and automate routine tasks better than any tool we’ve seen before. But as far as real business decisions, strategy, or creative leaps? That still takes a human brain.
If you bought into the idea that AI would “replace human judgment,” Apple’s findings should make you pause.
Businesses that pivoted everything to chase “AI-powered reasoning” may need to rethink their strategy fast (Reddit’s r/apple summary).
Here’s where I see a real risk: If you let the hype distract you from your fundamentals—knowing your customers, building strong teams, and actually solving real problems—you’ll fall behind.
The Pattern: AI Can Memorize, But Not Really Think
Let’s break down the core issue: pattern recognition vs. reasoning.
Apple’s paper proved that AI models nail problems they’ve seen before. The moment the pattern changes, they fail.
For example: Models could solve 100-move Tower of Hanoi puzzles (a classic computer science exercise found in most training data), but failed miserably at new, simpler puzzles they’d never encountered (Apple’s official research).
So if your business needs a tool to automate emails, summarize meetings, or handle FAQs—AI can help. But if you need it to think? That’s a whole different story.
What Should You Do With This Information?

Be skeptical of any AI solution that claims to handle “complex reasoning” or “decision-making” without a human in the loop. Ask for proof it can handle new situations—not just benchmarks.
Leverage AI for what it does best: pattern recognition, content generation, automation of repeatable tasks.
Keep your humans close for strategy, creative problem-solving, and anything that isn’t routine.
Don’t get me wrong—if you want to automate your business, tools like GoHighLevel actually do what they say. You get your CRM, marketing, sales, and automations in one place. (No, this isn’t another overhyped “AI” play—it’s real automation that helps real businesses today.)
How the AI Industry Is Reacting
The moment Apple’s research dropped, the usual suspects went into damage control (LinkedIn summary). Tech CEOs talked about “ongoing improvement” and tried to reframe the benchmarks. But the main problem stayed the same: If your AI is just a better parrot, can it ever be a real decision-maker?
This is the classic hype cycle at work. We’ve seen it with blockchain, VR, and the metaverse. Everyone’s selling the future, but most of the value is in the basics—solving real problems today (YouTube explainer).
The Future of “Reasoning” AI: Hope or Hype?
Here’s the real kicker—Apple isn’t saying AI is worthless. Far from it. The research points to new directions: maybe we need hybrid models, or different architectures, or even a new paradigm for machine intelligence (IBM’s perspective).
But don’t bet your business on science fiction. Bet it on tools and strategies that solve your actual problems—now, not in five years.
Lessons for Smart Entrepreneurs
Focus on real value, not hype. Tools that actually solve problems win.
Keep learning, keep questioning. Today’s breakthrough is tomorrow’s dead end. Don’t get stuck on last year’s buzzwords.
Invest in your team. Human creativity, judgment, and adaptability still beat any AI out there.
Use automation wisely. If you need everything in one place—CRM, marketing, websites, follow-ups—GoHighLevel is a legit option (and yes, you can try it free for 14 days).
Final Thoughts: Stay Skeptical, Stay Smart
The AI revolution is real—but it’s not what the marketing teams want you to believe. As Apple just proved, most “reasoning” AIs are just clever mimics. If you want your business to thrive, separate the hype from reality, double down on your fundamentals, and use the best tools for what they actually do well.
If you want more stories that cut through the noise (and expose the next big lie before it hits the headlines), make sure you’re subscribed to OnlineMarketer.ai and join our free newsletter for weekly insights you won’t get anywhere else.
The future belongs to those who keep asking hard questions—and refuse to settle for easy answers.
-
The information on this blog post and the resources available are for educational and informational purposes only. Links on this blog post may lead you to a product or service that provides an affiliate commission to us at no additional cost to you should you make a purchase. In no way does any affiliate relationship ever factor into a recommendation, or alter the integrity of the information we provide.